There is this recent thread in the workers section of the Green Monster. Again arguing about the possible theft of The Great Divide, published by Harry Lorayne in 1972, by Lennart Green who calls the move the Angle Separation.
Starts at 1:49
I'm not gonna argue. Just saying this. Both moves are similar in concept, but different. And a Classic Cull is superior to both of them. So why bother?
4 comments:
David's Cull is not the classical cull ...
I use Green's angle separation when I want to set up Prediction ShuffleBored impromptu. I run through the cards under the excuse of casting out eights and nines for an oil and water routine. So why not use a cull? Because my brain's not as fast as my hands. Talking whilst secretly separating whilst openly casting out eights and nines is not easy. For me at least.
David's Cull could work as an alternative, but it's not worth it to buy and learn and practice for me right now.
I don't like Harry's card fan, and I don't like David's ring and little fingers. But I like Lennart's Angle Separation. The only tell you have to watch for is aural.
BS
they're obviously different moves, the angle separation is 'angled' and harry's move is not. A stupid ass argument.
Post a Comment